Define absurd drama. Discuss Waiting for Godot as an absurd play

 

Absurd Drama is a sub-genre of Drama that focuses on the absurdity of human existence. It is very clear from the very word "Absurd" that it means nonsensical, opposed to reason, something silly, foolish, senseless, ridiculous and topsy-turvy. Moreover, a play having loosely constructed plot, unrecognizable characters, metaphysical called an absurd play.

Samuel Beckett is considered to be an important figure among the French Absurdist’s. "Waiting for Godot" is one of the masterpieces of Absurdist literature. Elements of Absurdity for making this play are so engaging and lively.

Characteristics of Absurd Theater:

• No story or plot
• No characterization and motivation
• Neither a proper beginning nor ending
• Unexplained themes
• Imitation of dreams or nightmares instead of nature
• Useless dialogues

 

Waiting for Godot by Samuel Beckett

“Waiting for Godot” as an Absurd Play:

“Waiting for Godot” fulfills every requirement of an absurd play. It has no story, no characterization, no beginning nor any end, unexplained themes, imitation of dreams and nightmares and above all it contains useless dialogues.

No story or plot:

“Waiting for Godot” does not tell any story nor does it has a plot. The play starts with waiting and ends with it. Characters do not go anywhere. They stand still in front of audience and do nothing except passing the ball. They talk and pass the time. Actions of characters are not related to plot but to themselves. Vladimir and Estragon wait for Godot and audience perceive that perhaps real story of the play will start after Godot’s arrival but Godot does not appear on stage nor is he introduced to the audience. Eventually, play ends with waiting. In this ways, “Waiting for Godot” fulfills first requirement of an absurd play.

Lack of Characterization:

We don’t know past of the characters. They are not introduced to the audience. We know only their names and their miserable situation. Their motifs are unclear. Although it is explicit that they are waiting for Godot yet it is not told to the audience that what purpose Godot will serve if he comes. Hence, lack of characterization proves that “Waiting of Godot” is a play of absurd theater.

No Beginning and End:

It has no beginning nor has any end. It starts with a situation and ends with it. Both the acts start and end in same way. When characters come on stage they reveal their purpose. They say they are waiting but Godot does not come and the act ends with waiting. Second act is also the copy of first act with minor differences. The play goes on and eventually ends with wait. Hence, there is no proper start of the play nor does it has a proper end.

It is a play in which nothing happens twice…. “Nothing happens, nobody comes … nobody goes, it’s awful!”.

Fulfillment of this requirement also proves that “Waiting for Godot” is an absurd play.

Useless Dialogues:

Most of the dialogues of this play serve no purpose. Whole play is based on delivery of dialogues but most of them have no apparent meanings. Every dialogue is full of symbols. Every word refers something in hidden meaning but it lacks the interest of audience because it lacks action.

Dialogues create action in every play. Action loses its importance without worthy dialogues. In case of “Waiting for Godot”, no action has been presented, therefore, dialogues are boring and they are written just to pass the ball. Word “nothing” has been repeated numerously in the play. It actually indicates nothingness in it.

Unexplained Themes:

Unclear themes also make “Waiting for Godot” a play of absurd theater. Audience do not observe any obvious theme in the play. Superiority of a play is always dependent on its themes. “Waiting for Godot” has no obvious theme. If there is any, it is hidden.

Imitation of Nightmares:

This play does not hold the mirror up to nature. It does not portray the manners and mannerisms of the ages. Martin Esslin is true in his definition of theater of absurd. This play “seem[s] often to be reflection of dreams and nightmares”.

At last but not the least, “Waiting for Godot” is entirely unconventional play. Samuel Becket violated all dramatic conventions. Indeed, every ingredient of theater of absurd has been fulfilled by him. Regardless of that this play is successful. He wrote this play to break the rules of traditional dramatists. “Waiting for Godot” completes every factor of theater of absurd, therefore, it can successfully be called the play of absurd.

Read More

Do you think that the Pozzo-Lucky relationship has any symbolic significance?

 

The Puzzo-Lucky pair plays a very significant role in portraying Beckett's world-view in Waiting for Godot. The dominant theme of this play is waiting, boredom, ignorance, and impotence. The Pozzo-Lucky relationship does not seem to have any basic or integral connection with this dominant theme. In fact, the connection between the two pairs of characters is not very close or intimate. Even if the Pozzo-Lucky episodes were removed from the play, the play would still stand and be satisfactory representation of the ordeal of waiting for someone who does not turn up or for something which does not materialize.

There are many interpretations of Pozzo and Lucky and their symbolic significance. According to one interpretation, these two men represent a master and a slave. According to other interpretations, Pozzo and Lucky symbolise the relationship between capital and labour, or between wealth and artist. A group of critics found autobiographical Origin: Pozzo representing James Joyce and Lucky as Samuel Backett. Another critic characterizes Pozzo as the God of the Old Testament, the tyrant in Act-1 and the New Testament God, helpless, crucified in Act-II.

Thus we have almost as many interpretations as there are critics. One of the critics says that, while Pozzo and Lucky may be body and intellect, master and slave, capitalist and proletarian, sadist and masochist, Joyce and Beckett. But they essentially represent a way of getting through life just as Vladimir and Estragon represent another way of doing so.

Pozzo and Lucky create a metaphor society. Pozzo appears as all-powerful, dominating personality by virtue of his wealth. He reminds us of a feudal lord. It is Lucky who gives Pozzo's ideas into real shapes. But for Lucky and Pozzo's thoughts and all his feelings would have been of common things. "Beauty, grace, truth of the first water"- these were originally all beyond Pozzo. But Lucky is now a puppet who obeys Pozzo's commands. He dances, sings, recites, and thinks for Pozzo and his personal life has been reduced to basic animal reflexes: he cries and he Kicks. But once Lucky was a better dancer and capable of giving his master moments of great illumination and joy; he was kind, helpful, entertaining, Pozzo's good angel. But now he is "killing" Pozzo, or so Pozzo believes.

In the play Waiting for Godot, we first see Lucky driven by Pozzo by means of a rope tied round his neck. All of Lucky's actions seem unpredictable, in Act-I, when Estragon attempts to help him. Lucky becomes violent and kicks him. Lucky seems to be more animal than human, and his very sentence in the drama is a parody of human sentence. In Act-II, when he arrives completely dumb, it is only a tilting extension of his condition in Act-I. Now he makes no attempt to utter any sound at all. Lucky represents the man, reduced to lead the blind, not by intellect, but by blind instinct.

There is another way of approaching this curious pair of characters. Perhaps, in the portrayal of Pozzo, Beckett has given us a caricature of God, the absolute power. Pozzo is the living symbol of the Establishment. He is an egotist, full of self-love. Pozzo's greatest concern is his dignity. He rebukes the tramps for asking him a question: "A moment ago you were calling me sir, in fear and trembling. Now you're asking me question. No good will come of this!" Here Pozzo's absolute mastery, his divinely delegated powers, must remain unchallenged.

Pozzo and Lucky represent the antithesis of each other. Yet they are strongly and irrevocably tied together- both physically and metaphysically. Any number of polarities could be used to apply to them. If Pozzo is the master, then Lucky is the slave. If Pozzo is the circus ring master, then Lucky is the trained or performing animal; if Pozzo is the sadist. Lucky is the masochist. Or Pozzo can be seen as the Ego and Lucky as the Id. Samuel Beckett, with his hope to represent human beings and super ego, has drawn the Pozzo-Lucky pair that has a great symbolic significance in the play.

Read More

Philip Larkin as a movement poet

 

A literary movement, also known as a literary school or literary group, refers to a collective of writers who share similar artistic, thematic, or stylistic concerns during a specific period of time. Philip Larkin is often regarded as a poet associated with the Movement, a literary group in post-World War II England.  Larkin's poems "Church Going" and "MCMXIV" can be examined within the context of his position as a movement poet, demonstrating his engagement with the concerns and aesthetic principles of the movement.

One of the central features of Movement poetry is its focus on everyday life and the ordinary experiences of individuals. In "Church Going," Larkin explores the theme of the decline of religious faith and the dwindling significance of the church in modern society. The poem centers around the speaker's visit to an empty church, symbolizing the loss of faith and the erosion of traditional values. Larkin's attention to the mundane details of the church, such as the "plaque and matting, seats, and stone," reflects the Movement's commitment to capturing the ordinary aspects of life and elevating them to poetic significance.

Likewise, "MCMXIV" can be seen as a movement poem through its portrayal of the ordinary lives of people before the outbreak of World War I. Larkin describes the streets, shops, and individuals going about their daily routines, creating a vivid image of a peaceful and simpler time. This focus on the ordinary highlights the Movement's interest in capturing the essence of the everyday and the impact of historical events on the lives of ordinary individuals.

Another characteristic of Movement poetry is its skepticism towards grand narratives and ideologies. In "Church Going," Larkin presents a critical perspective on religion, questioning its relevance and casting doubt on its significance. The poem explores the decline of religious faith and the erosion of traditional beliefs in a secular and modern world. Larkin's skepticism aligns with the Movement's rejection of ideological grandeur and its preference for a more individualistic and realistic approach to life.

Similarly, "MCMXIV" reflects a skepticism towards the idealized notions of the pre-war era. The poem juxtaposes the innocent past with the harsh realities of war, debunking romanticized notions of national pride and unity. Larkin's critical examination of historical events and societal values aligns with the Movement's rejection of sentimentalism and its inclination towards a more nuanced understanding of the human condition.

In terms of form and style, Larkin's poems often display a plain and direct language, eschewing elaborate metaphors and intricate structures. This simplicity of expression is a characteristic feature of Movement poetry, emphasizing clarity and accessibility. Larkin's use of precise and concrete imagery, as seen in both "Church Going" and "MCMXIV," contributes to the straightforward and unadorned style associated with the movement.

In conclusion, Philip Larkin can be considered a movement poet in relation to his poems "Church Going" and "MCMXIV." His engagement with the concerns of the Movement, such as the focus on everyday life, skepticism towards grand narratives, and simplicity of expression, is evident in these poems. By capturing the ordinary experiences of individuals and challenging established ideologies, Larkin contributes to the movement's broader aim of bringing a realistic and accessible perspective to poetry.

Read More

Discuss Meursault as an existential hero

 Meursault, the protagonist of Albert Camus' novel "The Stranger" ("L'Étranger"), is often regarded as an existential hero. Through his detached and indifferent demeanor, Meursault embodies key existentialist principles and challenges traditional societal expectations. Let's explore Meursault's character and actions, and how they reflect existentialist themes.

Existentialism is a philosophical movement that emphasizes individual existence, freedom, and the absence of inherent meaning or purpose in life. Meursault's character epitomizes these existentialist concepts in several ways.

1. Absurdity and Meaninglessness: Meursault's outlook on life is marked by a sense of absurdity and meaninglessness. He views life as a series of random events with no inherent purpose. This is evident in his indifferent response to his mother's death at the beginning of the novel. Rather than conforming to societal expectations of grief, Meursault remains detached and seemingly unaffected. This lack of emotional response highlights his belief in the inherent meaninglessness of human existence.

2. Alienation and Isolation: Meursault's alienation from society is a crucial element of his existentialist heroism. He feels disconnected from the social norms and expectations that govern the lives of others. This is apparent in his indifference to social conventions and his inability to connect with others on an emotional level. Meursault's isolation is further reinforced when he is put on trial for murder, as his refusal to conform to societal expectations makes him an outsider in the eyes of the court and the public.

3. Authenticity and Freedom: Meursault's authenticity lies in his unwavering commitment to his own experiences and desires. He refuses to play the roles assigned to him by society or adhere to established moral codes. Instead, he acts in accordance with his own instincts and desires. This is exemplified in his refusal to lie during his trial, even when doing so could have potentially saved him from the guillotine. Meursault's actions demonstrate his embrace of personal freedom and his rejection of external constraints.

4. Confrontation with Mortality: Meursault's confrontation with mortality plays a significant role in his existential journey. Throughout the novel, death is a recurring theme, serving as a constant reminder of life's transience. Meursault's acceptance of the inevitability of death and his refusal to succumb to fear or despair align with existentialist ideas. He recognizes that death is the ultimate truth of existence and refuses to allow it to dictate his actions or attitudes.

In conclusion, Meursault embodies the existential hero through his indifference to societal norms, his alienation from others, his pursuit of personal freedom and authenticity, and his confrontation with mortality. His character reflects existentialist themes such as the absurdity and meaninglessness of life, the importance of individual freedom, and the need for individuals to create their own meaning in an inherently chaotic and uncertain world.

Read More

Existentialism with reference to “Fern hill” and “Do not go gentle into that good night”

 

Existentialism is a philosophical movement that emerged in the 20th century, exploring the individual's existence and the meaning of life. It emphasizes the freedom and responsibility of individuals to make choices and create their own meaning in an uncertain and often absurd world. When discussing existentialism in relation to Dylan Thomas's poem "Fern Hill" and Dylan Thomas's "Do not go gentle into that good night," we can explore themes of time, mortality, and the human condition.

"Fern Hill" is a nostalgic and reflective poem that portrays the passage of time and the loss of innocence. It explores the existential theme of human existence in the face of an inevitable and uncontrollable force—time. The speaker reminisces about his childhood experiences at Fern Hill, a rural landscape filled with beauty and joy. However, as time progresses, the innocence and joy of the speaker's youth fade away, giving way to a realization of mortality and the transient nature of life.

In the context of existentialism, "Fern Hill" raises questions about the meaning of life and the significance of human existence. The speaker's longing for the past and the loss of innocence can be seen as an expression of the human desire to find meaning and hold onto fleeting moments. The poem suggests that the passage of time ultimately robs individuals of their innocence and youthful vitality, leaving them to confront the existential realities of aging, mortality, and the transience of existence.

Similarly, "Do not go gentle into that good night" explores existential themes but in a different manner. The poem is a villanelle, a highly structured form of poetry, and it addresses the universal topic of death. The poem implores individuals to resist death and fight against its inevitability, urging them to live fully until the end. It portrays various characters, including wise men, good men, wild men, and grave men, who are encouraged to rage against the dying of the light.

From an existentialist perspective, "Do not go gentle into that good night" captures the existential struggle against the limits and constraints of human existence. It emphasizes the importance of individual choice, defiance, and the refusal to accept fate passively. The poem suggests that individuals should strive to live authentically, resisting the despair and resignation that can arise when faced with mortality. By raging against death, the poem implies that individuals can assert their freedom and affirm their existence in the face of the inevitable.

In both "Fern Hill" and "Do not go gentle into that good night," existentialist themes of time, mortality, and the human condition are explored. These poems highlight the tension between the desire for meaning and the harsh realities of existence. They encourage reflection on the fleeting nature of life, the choices individuals make, and the existential struggle to find purpose and create meaning in an uncertain world.

Read More

Mrs. Dalloway by Virginia Woolf - Full Book Summary

 

“The World had raised its whip; where will it descend?”

-  Mrs Dalloway

 

Virginia Woolf was a British writer and one of the foremost modernists of the 20th century. Woolf's literary career began in earnest in the early 1910s. He is popularly well-known as a novelist specially for writing Mrs. Dalloway. Besides, To the Lighthouse and Orlando are famous novels written by him.

Mrs. Dalloway portrays a single day in the life of a woman from sunrise tonight. Clarissa Dalloway is an upper-class housewife. She goes on a walk around her London neighborhood in preparation for a party. Peter Walsh, an old suitor, and acquaintance, unexpectedly comes by her house when she returns from flower buying. They've always been harsh on one other. Their current interaction is linked with their memories of the past.

Clarissa had turned down Peter's marriage proposal years before. Peter has never fully recovered the pain. Clarissa is asked if she is satisfied with her husband, Richard. But she is interrupted by her daughter, Elizabeth. Because Elizabeth enters the room before Clarissa can respond. Peter gets in his car and drives to Regent's Park in London. He is still haunted by Clarissa's rejection. Woolf writes,

"Peter Walsh had been in love with her, had never told her, had never done anything"

The focus switches to Septimus who is a World War I soldier. He was injured in trench battle and is now suffering from shell shock. Septimus and Lucrezia, his Italian wife, relax in Regent's Park. They're waiting for Septimus' meeting with famous psychiatrist Sir William Bradshaw. Septimus was a blossoming young poet and Shakespeare admirer before the conflict.

Septimus had become immune to the horrors of war and its aftermath. He showed little grief when his buddy Evans died. He now sees nothing worthwhile in the England for which he fought. He has lost interest in preserving either his society or himself. Woolf writes,

"What was this terror?...... He was alone; he was unheeded, happy, and near to the wild heart of life".

This quote highlights the complexity of Septimus's mental illness. He feels a sense of terror and despair. But he also has moments of happiness and connection with life.

He is suicidal and thinks that his inability to feel is a crime. Septimus' experiences in the battle have clearly left him traumatized. He suffers from significant mental issues. Sir William, on the other hand, ignores Septimus' words. Septimus will be separated from Lucrezia and sent to a mental facility in the country, according to Sir William. Woolf writes,

"He went to France to save an England which consisted almost entirely of Shakespeare's plays and Miss Isabel Pole in a green dress walking in a square".

Hugh Whitbread and Lady Bruton, members of high society, attend lunch with Richard Dalloway. The gentlemen assist Lady Bruton in writing a letter to the Times newspaper. Richard arrives home to Clarissa with a big bouquet of roses after lunch. Richard arrives home to Clarissa with a big bouquet of roses after lunch.

Clarissa explores the gap that occurs between individuals, including husband and wife relationships. Even though she loves the privacy she can preserve in her marriage. She considers it essential to the relationship's success.

Clarissa watches Elizabeth and Miss Kilman, her history teacher. The two older ladies strongly dislike one another. Each thinks the other to be an oppressive influence in Elizabeth's life. As Elizabeth and Miss Kilman walk away, Clarissa observes them from her window and reflects on their relationship:

"She had been reconciled to this daughter lately; and what had made the change in her feelings was that she had asked her ................. down to buy a hat".

Meanwhile, Septimus and Lucrezia are having a happy time together in their apartment. Dr. Holmes, one of Septimus' physicians, comes, and Septimus is afraid the doctor will kill his soul. To avoid this destiny, he leaps to his death from a window.

When Peter hears the ambulance arrive to collect Septimus' body, he marvels sarcastically at London's degree of civilization. He attends Clarissa's party, which brings together the majority of the novel's key characters. Clarissa works tirelessly to ensure the success of her party. But she is unsatisfied with her own role and painfully aware of Peter's critical eye. 

All of the partygoers, notably Peter and Sally Seton, have failed to realize their childhood ambitions to some extent. Although the social order is certainly shifting, Elizabeth and her generation are likely to imitate Clarissa's mistakes.This lack of understanding and emotional distance may lead Elizabeth to feel neglected and resentful. The passage reads:

"Elizabeth could not help watching her mother, quietly, as she went about the room”

Sir William Bradshaw comes late, and his wife informs him that Septimus has killed himself. Clarissa locks herself up in a small room to think about Septimus' death. She realizes he was overwhelmed by life, and that people like Sir William made life unbearable.

Septimus inspires her, and she admires him for taking the risk and not sacrificing his soul. She believes she is to blame for his death because of her fortunate status. As the celebration draws to a conclusion, visitors begin to depart. Clarissa enters the room, and Peter becomes fascinated by her presence.

In conclusion, Peter Walsh's unrequited love for Clarissa Dalloway is a significant theme in Mrs. Dalloway. His inability to express his feelings leads to a sense of despair and hopelessness. He is unable to move on from his love for Clarissa, and it impacts his relationships with other people. The novel portrays the complexity of love and the impact it can have on an individual's life.

Read More

Major themes in Larkin’s poetry with reference to “Church” and MCMXIV”

 

Philip Larkin, one of the most prominent English poets of the 20th century, is known for his contemplative and often pessimistic reflections on various aspects of life. Two of his notable poems, "Church Going" and "MCMXIV," touch upon major themes that are prevalent throughout his body of work.

In "Church Going," Larkin explores the theme of the loss of religious faith and the declining significance of religion in the modern world. The poem begins with the speaker entering an empty church out of curiosity. He wanders through the building, observing its architecture, religious artifacts, and the absence of worshippers. Larkin captures the dwindling attendance and the speaker's own skepticism about the purpose and future of such places of worship. He muses on the waning influence of religion and questions its relevance in contemporary society. Larkin's portrayal of the church as a relic of the past reflects his contemplation of the erosion of faith in an increasingly secular world.

Similarly, "MCMXIV" (1914 in Roman numerals) explores themes of nostalgia and loss, particularly in the context of World War I. The poem reflects upon the innocent pre-war era and contrasts it with the brutal realities of the conflict. Larkin vividly describes the lives of ordinary people before they were affected by the war's devastation. Through his depiction of streets, shops, and people going about their daily lives, he creates a vivid image of a peaceful and simpler time. However, the poem takes a darker turn as Larkin introduces the war memorial, highlighting the loss of innocence and the irreversible changes brought about by the conflict. The poem ultimately captures a sense of nostalgia for a lost world and mourns the loss of lives and the shattered illusions of the past.

Another recurring theme in Larkin's poetry, evident in both "Church Going" and "MCMXIV," is the contemplation of time and mortality. In "Church Going," the speaker reflects on the transient nature of human existence compared to the enduring presence of the church. The poem suggests that while individuals may come and go, the church stands as a symbol of continuity and permanence. This theme is echoed in "MCMXIV" as well, as Larkin juxtaposes the idealized past with the reality of the present. The poem highlights the passage of time and its impact on society, conveying a sense of loss and the inevitability of change. Larkin often uses imagery of decay and decline to underscore the fleeting nature of life and the ultimate futility of human endeavors.

Moreover, Larkin's poetry often contains a social and cultural critique. In "Church Going," he critiques the loss of religious faith and questions the relevance of organized religion in a modern and secular society. The poem presents the church as a relic of the past, serving as a commentary on the erosion of traditional beliefs and the changing values of contemporary society. Similarly, "MCMXIV" offers a critical perspective on the impact of war. Larkin portrays the war as a rupture in history, disrupting the idealized world of the past and exposing the harsh realities of conflict. The poem reflects on the loss of innocence, the destruction of societal structures, and the disintegration of traditional values, offering a poignant critique of the human condition.

In summary, "Church Going" and "MCMXIV" encapsulate several major themes present in Philip Larkin's poetry. These themes include the loss of religious faith, nostalgia and loss, the contemplation of time and mortality, and social and cultural critique. Through his introspective and often somber reflections, Larkin explores the complexities of human existence, the changing nature of society, and the challenges of finding meaning and purpose in a rapidly evolving world.

Read More

Anna Fierling: A True Mother in "Mother Courage and Her Children"

Introduction:
Bertolt Brecht's play "Mother Courage and Her Children" depicts the hardships faced by Anna Fierling, also known as Mother Courage, during the Thirty Years' War. Anna Fierling is a remarkable character who embodies the spirit of a true mother. Despite her flaws and the choices she makes, her actions consistently display her fierce dedication to protecting and providing for her children. This assignment will explore the various aspects that establish Anna Fierling as a true mother.

Sacrifice and Protection:
Anna Fierling demonstrates her motherly love through her unwavering commitment to protecting her children. She is willing to sacrifice her own safety and well-being to ensure their survival. Throughout the play, Anna endures immense hardships, risks her life, and makes difficult choices to shield her children from harm.

Unconditional Love:
Anna Fierling's love for her children is unconditional, even when they disappoint or betray her. Despite the strained relationships with her three children, Eilif, Swiss Cheese, and Kattrin, she remains fiercely devoted to them. This unwavering love is evident in her constant efforts to reunite with them and provide for their needs, regardless of their actions.

Determination and Resilience:
Anna Fierling exhibits remarkable determination and resilience in the face of adversity. Despite the devastation of war and the loss she experiences, she remains resilient, pushing forward for the sake of her children. Her determination to survive and protect her family serves as a testament to her role as a true mother.

Pragmatism and Resourcefulness:
As a mother, Anna Fierling demonstrates exceptional pragmatism and resourcefulness. She utilizes her wit and street smarts to navigate through the war-torn landscape, often resorting to unconventional means to support her family. Her ability to adapt to the ever-changing circumstances showcases her resourcefulness and highlights her dedication to her children's well-being.

Maternal Instincts:
Anna Fierling's maternal instincts are a driving force throughout the play. She possesses a keen sense of intuition, making decisions that prioritize the safety and survival of her children. Her actions, although not always perfect, are motivated by her desire to protect them from the dangers of the war, thereby reinforcing her role as a true mother.

Teachings and Life Lessons:
Anna Fierling imparts valuable life lessons and teachings to her children. Despite her often harsh and cynical demeanor, she shares her experiences and wisdom with them, intending to prepare them for the harsh realities of life. Through her guidance, she instills resilience, self-reliance, and survival skills in her children, which further solidifies her role as a true mother.

Conclusion:
Anna Fierling, or Mother Courage, exemplifies the qualities of a true mother in Bertolt Brecht's play "Mother Courage and Her Children." Her sacrifices, unconditional love, determination, pragmatism, maternal instincts, and teachings all serve as testament to her unwavering dedication to her children's well-being. Despite the challenging circumstances of war, Anna Fierling's actions consistently revolve around protecting and providing for her children. Through her character, Brecht explores the complexities of motherhood and highlights the resilience and strength of a mother's love.

Read More

Thematic Aspects of Shakespearean Sonnets

Shakespearean sonnets, a form of poetry popularized by William Shakespeare, are renowned for their lyrical beauty and emotional depth. While adhering to a specific structure, these sonnets also explore various themes that resonate with readers across time. This assignment examines the thematic aspects commonly found in Shakespearean sonnets, shedding light on the profound ideas and emotions conveyed through these poetic works.

1. Love and Desire: Love is perhaps the most prominent theme in Shakespearean sonnets. The sonnets explore the complexities of romantic love, encompassing themes of infatuation, desire, devotion, and heartbreak. Shakespeare delves into the depths of human emotions, portraying both the ecstasy and the anguish that love can bring.

2. Time and Transience: The theme of time and its fleeting nature is a recurring motif in Shakespearean sonnets. The speaker reflects on the brevity of life, the inevitability of aging, and the transient beauty of youth. These sonnets often emphasize the passing of time and its effect on love, urging readers to cherish and appreciate the present moment.

3. Beauty and Immortality: Shakespearean sonnets frequently explore the theme of beauty and its potential for immortality. The beloved's physical appearance, grace, and charm are celebrated, with the speaker often likening them to eternal beauty. Through poetic expression, Shakespeare suggests that love and art have the power to transcend time, allowing beauty to endure beyond the boundaries of mortality.

4. Artistic Creation and Poetry: A meta-theme found in Shakespearean sonnets revolves around the act of writing poetry itself. The sonnets explore the power of language and artistic creation, highlighting the role of poetry in capturing and conveying emotions, immortalizing beauty, and expressing the depths of human experience. Shakespeare often uses the sonnets as a medium to reflect on the nature of poetry and its ability to evoke profound feelings.

5. Nature and the Seasons: Shakespearean sonnets draw inspiration from the natural world, using it as a metaphorical backdrop for exploring human emotions. The changing seasons, the beauty of landscapes, and the cycles of nature are employed to reflect the ebb and flow of love, the passage of time, and the inevitable shifts in human relationships.

6. Truth and Deception: The theme of truth and deception is also present in Shakespearean sonnets. The speaker grapples with questions of honesty, sincerity, and authenticity within relationships. Sonnets may explore the complexities of appearances versus reality, questioning whether love is genuine or merely an illusion.

7. Gender Roles and Societal Expectations: Shakespearean sonnets occasionally touch upon themes of gender roles and societal expectations within romantic relationships. The sonnets reflect the cultural norms and social constraints of the Elizabethan era, highlighting the challenges and limitations imposed by society on love and personal expression.

Conclusion: Shakespearean sonnets encapsulate a diverse range of themes, offering readers an intimate glimpse into the complexities of human emotion and experience. Through themes such as love, time, beauty, artistry, nature, truth, and societal expectations, these sonnets continue to resonate with audiences, affirming their enduring relevance and artistic brilliance.

Read More

Waiting for Godot as an Absurd Play

Samuel Becket's is the pioneer of absurdities. His masterpiece "Waiting for Godot" shows the real absurdity of life. The elements of absurdities are vividly presented here.

It is fairly definable from the word "Absurd" which refers to something that is nonsensical, worthless, meaningless, nothingness, foolish and ridiculous. So, a drama which is going to gift a long train of absurdness (boring) can be called an Absurd drama. It is the play which is constructed loosely as well as ghostly characters. Life is reflected as purposeless, aimless and meaningless.

In the absurd theater irrational experiences of life are presented instead of logical construction and rational ideas.

Waiting for Godot is considered as a absurd not only for its loosely constructed plot, but also for the characters who are just like puppet. The theme of the play is mysterious. The characters, presented here without any purpose of life. They are just passing their time and waiting for someone who is not to be sure to come. They just do things. The dialogues of the play are purely absurd which have no direction to the past or future. We find the characters who are babbling throughout play inadequately.  So, absurdities prevail in everywhere and it has become more acute when we see that time is changeless. But, a change is noticeable that now the tree has sprouted four or five leaves.

"Nothing happens, nobody comes, nobody goes, its awful"

The beginning, middle and the end of the play cannot be located it as a good play, but absurd.

Another reason which can be noted for its absurdity is the difference from poetic stage. Either dream and emotions or poetic language is absent here. The situation is constant and changeless enigmatic vein prevails throughout the play. No specific rules are followed in the mixture of tragic and comic elements. In the act-I it is very difficult for the characters to detect what action should be taken for their constant life. A bundle of hesitations have riddled their mind. They want to leave each other but do not dare to abandoned that place. Estragon does not want to pay heed what Vladimir is saying. But, Vladimir is saying continuously and Estragon is also cannot forsake his words. They were passing their lives with a transparent deception. Godot is mystery and remain the top quest of the readers. Their waiting is endless which seems to be absurd. The fact which is important that they are not unconscious about the absurdity and the whole world is waiting for things, which are absurd and mystery.

"Waiting for Godot" is the play which is extinction of any female character. Vladimir and Estragon, who are susceptive about their identity, wait for the ultimate extinction in a frustrated way. All the things are presented here as meaningless and purposeless which produce absurdness.

Absurdity gets its full extent when the play has got its finishing touch. Waiting for uncertain possibility continues, human communication remains unsolved, the problem of existence remains meaningless and purposeless. The conversation between the two tramps remain in jargon really humbug and bunkum speech. So, all this things untidily make the play absurd.
 

Read More